Why Presentation Matters
In many OSCE circuits, you'll be asked to present your findings verbally to the examiner — either at the end of a history station or in a dedicated presentation station. A clear, confident, well-structured presentation demonstrates clinical reasoning in a way that a good history alone doesn't.
Examiners use your presentation to assess:
- What you consider clinically important
- Whether you've formed a differential
- How you think about management
The Standard Presentation Structure
1. The Opening Line
Start with a one-sentence summary that gives the key demographics, presentation, and context:
"This is [name], a [age]-year-old [sex] who presents with [chief complaint] of [duration], in the context of [relevant background]."
Examples:
"This is Mr Ahmed, a 62-year-old man who presents with a two-day history of central chest pain radiating to his left arm, in the context of known hypertension and type 2 diabetes."
"This is Mrs Chen, a 28-year-old woman who presents with a three-month history of low mood and anhedonia, with no previous psychiatric history."
💡 Tip
The opening line is the most important sentence in your presentation. It should immediately tell the examiner the patient's key demographics, primary symptom, and critical context. Practise writing and saying opening lines until it's automatic.
The Full Presentation Structure
History of Presenting Complaint (1–2 minutes)
Summarise the SOCRATES findings — don't repeat every answer. Pick the clinically relevant features:
"The pain is described as central, crushing, 8/10 in severity, with radiation to the left arm and jaw. It came on at rest and has been present for approximately two hours. It is associated with diaphoresis and nausea. It is not relieved by rest. He has not tried GTN. He denies shortness of breath, palpitations, or syncope."
Systems Review (30 seconds)
"Systematic review is notable for [positives only, plus relevant negatives]."
Include only relevant positives and specifically relevant negatives. Don't list everything you asked.
"Systematic review is positive for reduced exercise tolerance over the past month. He denies cough, haemoptysis, leg swelling, or urinary symptoms."
Past Medical History
"His past medical history is significant for [list, including specifically relevant conditions first]. He has no previous cardiac investigations or interventions."
Drug and Allergy History
"He is currently taking amlodipine 10mg OD, metformin 500mg BD, and atorvastatin 40mg nocte. No known drug allergies."
Family History
"Family history is notable for his father having a myocardial infarction at age 55."
Social History
"He is a 30-pack-year ex-smoker who stopped five years ago. He drinks approximately 10 units of alcohol per week. He lives with his wife and is retired. He can normally mobilise independently."
Impression and Differential
💎 Clinical Pearl
This is where good students separate from great ones. Don't just present facts — give your interpretation.
"In summary, this gentleman presents with features highly suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome. My differential includes NSTEMI as the most likely diagnosis given the classic features, with unstable angina also possible. I would want to exclude aortic dissection given the severity and radiation of the pain, and PE given his reduced exercise tolerance."
Proposed Investigations and Management
"I would investigate with an urgent 12-lead ECG, serial troponins at 0 and 3 hours, FBC, U&E, LFTs, coagulation, glucose, and a portable CXR. If ACS is confirmed, I would refer immediately to the cardiology team and initiate dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, and oxygen as required per the ACS protocol."
What to Leave Out
Less experienced students include too much. Experienced presenters are selective.
| Leave out | Include |
|---|---|
| Normal SOCRATES findings | Positive SOCRATES findings |
| All negative systems review | Specifically relevant negative findings |
| Medications not relevant to the presentation | All medications (they may become relevant) |
| Normal family history | First-degree relative with relevant condition |
| Lengthy biographical details | Occupation if relevant; functional baseline |
Handling Examiner Questions
After your presentation, examiners will probe. Common questions:
"What's your top differential and why?"
"My top differential is NSTEMI because of the characteristic features: central crushing chest pain at rest in a high-risk patient with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. The cardiac cause must be proven or excluded before I consider anything else."
"What would you do if the initial ECG were normal?"
"A normal initial ECG does not exclude ACS. I would continue serial ECGs and troponins, maintain the patient on continuous monitoring, and manage clinically as ACS until biomarkers return."
"What if the patient refuses admission?"
"I would clearly explain the potential consequences of leaving — including the risk of a life-threatening event — document the conversation, and ask the patient to sign a self-discharge form. I would ensure they have clear safety netting and a low threshold to return."
💡 Tip
If you don't know the answer to an examiner question:
"That's a great question. I know that [what you do know]. I'm less certain about the specific details of [what you don't know] and I'd want to review the guidelines and discuss with my senior."
This is far better than guessing. Examiners respect intellectual honesty.
Example Short Presentation (3 minutes)
"This is Mrs Patel, a 45-year-old woman presenting with a 12-hour history of severe right upper quadrant pain, rated 8 out of 10, with radiation to the right shoulder tip. The pain came on after a large meal, is colicky in nature, and is associated with nausea and two episodes of vomiting. She denies fever, jaundice, or change in bowel habit. She has a past history of type 2 diabetes and obesity. She takes metformin and is not allergic to any medications. Family history is notable for her mother having gallstones. She is a non-smoker and drinks minimal alcohol. She works as a teacher and lives with her husband and two children.
>
In summary, the presentation is highly consistent with biliary colic, likely secondary to gallstones. The differential would also include cholecystitis — though she is afebrile — and hepatitis. I would investigate with bloods including FBC, LFTs, amylase, and CRP, urinalysis, and an urgent abdominal ultrasound."